|
Mortimer West End 350 home proposal
The recent Full Council debate gave councillors representing other parts of West Berkshire the opportunity to consider the proposal and its potential cross-boundary effects. Two contributions particularly caught my attention.
Cllr Kander (Con, Tilehurst & Purley) questioned whether West Berkshire should already have been doing more and suggested there was a risk of the debate appearing "Passport to Pimlico" and “a bit NIMBY-ish”.
I do not think that reflects the history of the issue. West Berkshire Council had already engaged with Basingstoke & Deane, held a public meeting at the opening of the Regulation 18 consultation, supported residents in responding and submitted a detailed officer-led response covering the technical and infrastructure issues. The July motion was not the beginning of that work. It followed the officer-led response and allowed the Council formally to place its political position on record.
Cllr Somner (Con, Tilehurst South & Holybrook) drew a comparison with the relationship between Reading and communities such as Calcot, where residents may live in one council area but rely heavily on services in another, suggesting that the Mortimer West End case is similar — essentially suggesting there was relatively little distinction between the situations. Such cross-boundary relationships are real, but I don't think the comparison applies to the Mortimer West End case. As I said in the debate, there is no bus service of note in Mortimer West End — and no shops. The concern here is more that a substantial new settlement would be physically attached to Mortimer while lying within another authority, but relying on West Berkshire's services and infrastructure.
I was pleased that the Council ultimately supported the motion unanimously and that the debate secured wider press coverage. |